Login
 
Forgotten password

Create an Account
Free and easy! Gain immediate access to additional information and resources. Required for Certified Instructors who are first-time visitors to our site.
Feedback

Advocating to Prevent Restraint in Washington Schools

By Nicholas Tendler | November 09, 2015 | Washington | Pending
Advocating to Prevent Restraint in Washington Schools
At CPI, we’re passionate about advocating to create a safer society. As subject matter experts in crisis prevention, we share best-practice recommendations to help policymakers develop clear, effective policies to protect vulnerable people—and to protect the staff members who care for our society’s most vulnerable.

Below is the public comment letter we wrote to help Washington’s Superintendent of Public Instruction create guidelines for staff to follow on reducing the use of restraint with students.

Comment Letter Provided to
Douglas H. Gill
Assistant Superintendent, Special Education, OSPI
P.O. Box 47200, Olympia, WA 98504-7200


November 9, 2015

RE: Amended Chapter 392-172A WAC – Comment Letter

To whom it may concern,

We would like to thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on behalf of the 29,000 active members of the Crisis Prevention Institute (CPI) Instructor Association regarding the proposed adoption of Amended Chapter 392-172A WAC.

For over 35 years, CPI has been active in training professionals in the skills necessary to prevent and manage a crisis situation and to safely intervene physically when required.

We share the Superintendent of Public Instruction’s goals of reducing restraint through an emphasis on prevention and early intervention, and by focusing on appropriate restraint policies intended to reduce the risks of performing restraints.

CPI applauds the Superintendent of Public Instruction for its efforts in creating a comprehensive set of guidelines for staff to follow on the use of restraint with students.

With that said, CPI would offer a few specific recommendations to the policy to improve the clarity and effectiveness of the rule for school staff as follows:

WAC 392-172A-02076 and WAC 392-172A-01109:

Stated Policy:
WAC 392-172A-02076 supports the ideal in which restraint shall not be used unless there is “an imminent likelihood of serious harm.” However WAC 392-172A-01109 defines likelihood of serious harm to include “A substantial risk that: (c) Physical harm will be inflicted by a person upon the property of others, as evidenced by behavior that has caused substantial loss or damage to the property of others;”

Recommendation:
CPI would recommend the removal of WAC 392-172A-01109 section C as it is inconsistent with this section and subsequent sections that only qualify restraints used when a student is perceived to be a danger to themselves or others.

Stated Policy:
(10) Any staff member or other adults using a restraint device must be trained and certified in the use of such restraint devices, or otherwise available in the case of an emergency when trained personnel are not immediately available due to the unforeseeable nature of the emergency.

Recommendation:
Crisis intervention skills are perishable, in that if they are not frequently practiced, these skills can degrade over time. Most (roughly 80+%) of our customer retrain staff at least annually, some even more frequently. CPI would suggest adding a provision creating a specific schedule on staff training and staff retraining. CPI would advocate for a minimum of an annual refresher in the training curriculum to include an annual demonstration in written and physical competencies. Having been trained at one time in a given strategy does not assure a level of skill, competence or utility. Refresher training helps ensure that these critical skills do not degrade over time.

Refresher Frequency for Crisis Prevention Institute Customers:

refresher-training-tech-validate.jpg

CPI believes that the Superintendent of Public Instruction has incorporated many of the most important considerations within the policy that have proven to result in a successful adoption as seen in other, similar policy statements.

In fact, many of the inclusions such as training requirements for staff conducting restraint and requiring restraint to be removed after the likelihood of harm has dissipated are important and sometimes overlooked elements in a policy such as this.

We understand how challenging the drafting of a rule like this is and commend the Superintendent for his efforts. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this important policy and hope that you find these recommendations helpful.

Should you have any questions, or have an interest in discussing the recommendations, I encourage you to contact me via phone at 414.979.7129 or by email.

Sincerely,
Daniel Gugala
General Counsel
Crisis Prevention Institute
 

Additional resources


For more like this, check out our Advocacy posts for best-practice recommendations on policies that are in development. Also keep an eye on our Legislation section, where we post information about rules, laws, and regulations that have passed, and you can research legislation in your state if applicable. You can also read about restraint reduction and CPI training, and get details about Nonviolent Crisis Intervention® training.

 

 
Contact Us Today!
Want to discuss how Nonviolent Crisis Intervention® training can help you meet these requirements? Contact Karen Yungwirth at 877.877.5389 Ext. 52310 or kyungwirth@CrisisPrevention.com.

We Can Help You Meet the Training Requirements!

Want to learn how?
Contact Me Today.
Karen Yungwirth
Training Coordinator
877.877.5389 Ext. 52310
Get Your Customized Training Solution.
Tell us what you need and find out how on-site training—tailored to your needs—can help your organization.